Peace. Social Justice. Climate Survival
Things have been hectic today, so much so that a planned video interview that was going to appear here has had to be put off until next week. As has been well documented, both on televison and radio as well as on a number of blogs, I declared today that I am standing for the leadership fo the Labour Party.
We need an election. We cannot stumble on without the issues being debated. We have seen inequality grow to levels higher than at any time since the 1930s. The world has become a less safe place in which to live. We are simply strolling without the necessary urgency along the path to controlling carbon emissions and dealing with climate change.
Elections have their own dynamic and the ballot could be 3-4 months away. Some of the coverage has predictably focused upon the issue of MP nominations. I am confident that I have the required supoport to be on the ballot. That's not an issue that can be settled until the nominations are actually made. Until then I intend to spend that time campainging hard to make sure the arguments - the alternatives to New Labour - are heard.
The BBC's James Landale seemed to be the only journalist who picked up on the real issues when he said on News 24 that the point of the campaign was to pick up the banner of the Labour left and wave it as loudly and visibly as possible. That's why taking the railways back into public ownership, rejecting renewal of Trident and the gross discrepancies between the highest paid and the lowest were issues I raised at the press conference this morning.
Crucially, he also said the interesting thing will be to see how these policies resonate with party members over the coming months.
Do they want to see Trident renewed? Most polls suggest otherwise, that people know there is no enemy against which they can be used, not terorrists, not rogue states.
Do they want to see the wage packets of the lowest pay to also rise when city bonuses are handed out? I think the answer is yes.
Do they want to see a massive investment in renewable energy technologies, cutting carbon emisisons and providing jobs in manufacturing and in research and development? Addressing global warming does not require wearing a hairshirt, it requires committment and innovation - and the rewards are huge.
If, as I believe, the centre-left is actually the mainstream, then these arguments should resonate loud and very clear. Only by putting them to the party can we see if that is the case. I think I have the policies, experience and expertise required for the job - now I want the party to have the opportunity to decide.
Comments
There are so very many issues, not just Iraq, where the voice of the left has to be heard. For me, for example, the issue isn't so much who owns the railroads so long as whoever runs them does so in a way that benefits the most people. It has been a long time, but I really do think that the days of Margaret Thatcher and Keith Joseph are over at last, and we have gotten over the idea that ownership by private, profit-seeking individuals does not necessarily make an organisation efficient or more useful to the public. I don't necessarily mean that some government office needs to control everything, just that we need some new ideas for transport, the NHS, everything.
I would like to see all the people with their ideas and ideals who have been watching from the sidelines will join into a community of human beings who will create a better world for their children and generations to come.
Christopher
Posted by: Christopher Hobe Morrison | February 23, 2007 01:57 AM
Its good to see a candidate who is flying the Labour flag because its a debate we must have in the party...
Posted by: marcus warner | February 23, 2007 05:20 PM
Re Social Justice, it would be nice to see Carers (people on Carers Allowance) getting some 'Social Justice' INSTEAD of the usual exploitation.
So come on Michael, tell me how you see Carers and if you won the leadership battle would you help relieve Carer-poverty? The New Deal was a waste of time, merely a PR exercise as we all know, it won't help Carers in the slightest.
A benefit that you have to work a MINIMUM 35 hours a week, in fact the ONLY benefit you have to work for (it is work, ask any social services care worker how much we do that they wouldn't be ALLOWED to do) where you get paid £46.95 at most, though only a fraction of the 6 million Carers receive this full amount, retired pensioners who are Carers have that stolen off them.
So let me know if you intend to help Carers because every other politician screws us, that's natural because we save this country over £57 BILLION POUNDS EACH YEAR, it's 'natural but morally indefensible.
I invite you to do a web-chat with our members (UK Carers www.ukcarers.org.uk) to answer questions from Carers, we aren't the normal run-of-the-mill beaten into submission types so I cannot promise you an easy ride BUT I want a Minister with guts to talk to us rather than evade us, are you up for that? You have my email address if not I'm sure Anne McGuire or Ivan Lewis will pass it to you.
Posted by: Clive Arnold | March 3, 2007 12:52 PM