The succession to Gordon Brown
May 10th, 2010So Gordon Brown has now bowed to the inevitable, and after all the indignity and humiliations heaped on him by a poisonous right-wing press and hostile polls, we should respect both his past resilience against all the odds and now the dignity of his going. It was clearly the right decision to stand down to pave the way for the root-and-branch renewal of Labour which is now so urgently needed.
The election result however wasn’t a judgement on a single individual, but rather on the collective failure of New Labour over bank reform, privatisation of public services, and the ballooning of inequality which shames our society. A social partnership economy is now needed which embraces the working class as well as Middle England, and a new Labour leader is needed who can deliver that.
Alarmingly there is talk of using an abstruse provision in the Labour Party Rule Book to precipitate an almost immediate election of a new Leader by the Cabinet, and the lengthy presence of Mandelson and Campbell inside No.10 has only served to spread the concern. The rule states that when Labour is in government, the ‘permanent unavailability’ of the Leader/Prime Minister can be resolved by election from among their number by the Cabinet. That clearly relates however to such contingencies as a fatal accident, a debilitating illness, or mental or nervous breakdown. It is not designed for eventualities like the present one where Brown has said he will temporarily remain in position until a new leader is elected before Conference in September.
Any attempt to foist a new Leader on the party without due process of election legitimised by the CLPs, trade unions and PLP would hideously backfire. The proper acceptable procedure would be for the NEC urgently to draw up a timetable for nominations, hustings and election before the parliamentary recess in the third week of July. That is a matter I intend to raise if necessary at the first PLP meeting of this new Parliament at 2.30pm this Wednesday. That scenario would then allow the party to begin the thorough review of its fundamental policy stance in the post-neoliberal world we now live in and to choose its new Leader accordingly.











May 10th, 2010 at 10:03 pm
Good article from Michael Meacher MP on Gordons resignation http://www.michaelmeacher.info/weblog/2010/05/the-succession-to-gordon-brown/
May 10th, 2010 at 10:14 pm
Oldham West MP Michael Meacher blogs about Brown's departure – http://bit.ly/9HPn5z (via @theday2day)
May 10th, 2010 at 11:14 pm
So Michael Meacher, whose role in the most clearly impotent period in Labour’s history downplays the prospective passing of Labour’s most successful achiever and hopes we shall avert resumption of business for British people.
(OK he has been useful too, but . . . I’d almost rather consult Ramsay Mac)
May 11th, 2010 at 12:42 am
[...] by Michael Meacher MP [...]
May 11th, 2010 at 9:12 am
“..in the post-neoliberal world we now live in..”
Since when, Michael? O would that it were so!
May 12th, 2010 at 12:57 pm
Hello again Michael,
Congratulations in retaining your seat.
Labour needs to be rescued from the ghoulish grip of Campbell & Mandelson if it is to survive in the long term.
Henry Porter reported that Labour insisted on retaining ID cards ie totalitarianism as a condition of a ‘left’ coalition. http://bit.ly/91gAaO
My comment was “I think God failed to invent an emotion to adequately express one’s reaction to that”.
The immediate task for the Labour Party is not to seek re-election but to recover its soul. I wish you luck.