<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Left voice will be heard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaelmeacher.info/weblog/2010/06/the-left-voice-will-be-heard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaelmeacher.info/weblog/2010/06/the-left-voice-will-be-heard/</link>
	<description>Labour MP for Oldham West and Royton</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:16:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gould</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelmeacher.info/weblog/2010/06/the-left-voice-will-be-heard/comment-page-1/#comment-1782</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gould</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelmeacher.info/weblog/?p=977#comment-1782</guid>
		<description>@Jeremy
Let&#039;s hope so.

Both the entire Labour Party &amp; trades union movement should be thanking McDonnell.

Note that he was the only candidate who didn&#039;t vote for the Abolition of Parliament Bill.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article733022.ece71jVFBdEg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jeremy<br />
Let&#8217;s hope so.</p>
<p>Both the entire Labour Party &amp; trades union movement should be thanking McDonnell.</p>
<p>Note that he was the only candidate who didn&#8217;t vote for the Abolition of Parliament Bill.<br />
<a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article733022.ece71jVFBdEg" rel="nofollow">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article733022.ece71jVFBdEg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Sutcliffe</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelmeacher.info/weblog/2010/06/the-left-voice-will-be-heard/comment-page-1/#comment-1779</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Sutcliffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 20:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelmeacher.info/weblog/?p=977#comment-1779</guid>
		<description>David Miliband&#039;s move might be too clever for his own good. A bit smarmy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Miliband&#8217;s move might be too clever for his own good. A bit smarmy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EddieG</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelmeacher.info/weblog/2010/06/the-left-voice-will-be-heard/comment-page-1/#comment-1773</link>
		<dc:creator>EddieG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelmeacher.info/weblog/?p=977#comment-1773</guid>
		<description>Yes, but how did nominating the already nominated Ed Miliband help this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but how did nominating the already nominated Ed Miliband help this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthew downie</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelmeacher.info/weblog/2010/06/the-left-voice-will-be-heard/comment-page-1/#comment-1757</link>
		<dc:creator>matthew downie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 23:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelmeacher.info/weblog/?p=977#comment-1757</guid>
		<description>Of course a broader debate is welcome, but tokenism comes in many forms it seems. I am just very concerned that Dianne&#039;s inclusion legitimises the likely outcome from all this and statements that will surely follow about how it will have been a &#039;broad&#039; or &#039;representative&#039; debate. No signs of either so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course a broader debate is welcome, but tokenism comes in many forms it seems. I am just very concerned that Dianne&#8217;s inclusion legitimises the likely outcome from all this and statements that will surely follow about how it will have been a &#8216;broad&#8217; or &#8216;representative&#8217; debate. No signs of either so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

