Comments on: Wikileaks: what were the media doing?

By: Robert

Robert — Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:02:18 +0000

Tell lies to make more wars more dead.

By: Andy

Andy — Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:50:10 +0000

Wikileaks material seems to have Military Reports and Intelligence reports mixed together. To my mind – the military reports (of civilian casualties) is probably true but the intelligence reports of Pakistan ISI and AQ operatives seem to be pure speculation – yet both have been treated as “fact”. Are we sure that Wikileaks hasn’t been spun a giant PysOps operation (in the same style as The Man That Never Was) to justify more war in the region?

By: Robert

Robert — Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:34:29 +0000

But I remember Brown just a few months before the election telling the media, news report from the front line was over, until after the elections, he controlled the information we could get, sadly of course you cannot hide the death of a soldier, mind you he did try.

We all know that 200,000 people did not die in Iraq we all know it’s into the millions, we also know many people in Afghanistan are dying.

The simple fact you try to control the media it will always come out, the question is when it comes out for Brown it did not matter , he was the reason labour lost nothing else.