Blairites now hold half the seats in new Shadow Cabinet

October 8th, 2011

Ed Miliband, having won the right to secure a Shadow Cabinet entirely drawn from his own appointments, has now had the chance for the first time to show his political hand in his selections.   Surprisingly he has increased the proportion of Blairites from a third (under the previous system of election) to half.   Since his own orientation is centre-Left, this has to be explained as placating a faction which remains very numerous (arguably a majority) within the PLP and is well organised and extremely well-funded.   Lord Sainsbury, a strong supporter of the Blairite Tendency, stopped funding Labour when Ed Miliband won the leadership, and transferred his affections – and more importantly, his money – to the Blairite pressure group, Progress.   It goes without saying of course that if the Left had carried out a similar manoeuvre, it would have been disallowed as running a party within a party and any Left equivalent of Progress would have been disbanded.

The Balls camp within the Shadow Cabinet has also been increased.   It now numbers about a fifth of its members.    The remainder, who can be broadly described as the Miliband camp, form about a third of the total.   The Leader therefore, even after switching from elections to his own personal appointments, remains in a minority in his own Shadow Cabinet.   Another dimension of this freshly appointed body is the Left-Right split among its members.   In many ways this is more important, and more revealing, than the proportions of the various personalised affiliations.   The division is quite staggering.   The Right hold about 17 of the 27 seats, the centre-Left 9, and the Left just 1 (Jon Trickett).  

This exposes several important facts.   First, it shows the huge degree that Thatcher pulled the Labour Party to the Right, the relentlessness with which Blair continued this distortion of the party’s principles to reinforce his own power, and how far this Tendency within the party remains embedded in a dominat position.   Second, it shows how little progress Ed Miliband has so far made in wrenching the party back to the Labour centre-ground and how far the leading personnel in the new young PLP remain firmly pitched on the Right.   Third, it reveals how far the PLP remains disconnected from its activist supporters within both the constituencies and the the unions.   The Westminster Bubble has been yanked to the neo-liberal Right and the Labour Party, which should be standing apart from this and proclaiming the alternative ideology which it has always been its historic role to fight for, is still too much part of the discredited ancien regime now busted by the financial crash of 2008-9 and the fast-approaching global depression.

4 Responses to “Blairites now hold half the seats in new Shadow Cabinet”

  1. David Fornman Says:

    Michael Meacher is spot-on with his analysis. Ed Miliband has exposed his New Labour rooys by his selection of Shadow Cabinet posts. I always believed Ed was used to split a left vote between him and Diane Abbott in order to ensure a David Miliband victory. One only had to look at the expression on Ed’s face when the leadership result was announced: one of absolute shock. David Miliband continues to spread his neo-liberal agenda through “Movement for Change”, which along with Progress is a “Party within a party”. Labour has been hijacked by big business interests, far removed from Labour’s founding principles. A new book by Torquil Cowan on the life of Robert Smillie, miners leader and co-founder of Labour with Kier Hardie, entitled “Labour of Love” clearly explains this hypothesis. Workers and unions need to lose their romantic attachment to a party that now represents the interests of capitalists.

  2. Syzygy Says:

    A graph on this blog shows just how far the Labour party has moved rightward economically and becoming much more authoritarian since 1972. I was surprised that the shift happened before the 1983 election which is always held up as being so extreme. I think that most activists would locate themselves nearer to the 1972 position.

    http://think-left.org/2011/09/24/is-the-labour-party-going-to-become-real-labour/

    It is nice to know that Tony Blair was slightly less economically right wing and slightly less authoritarian than George Bush … but only just.

    As for the re-shuffle … it is too depressing to comment. Caroline Flint and Liam Byrne still in place. Why??

  3. Roger Simpson Says:

    So Lord Sainsbury threw his toys out of the pram when “his man” wasn’t elected leader of the PLP.
    I have maintained the view that political parties should be funded by the state to avoid them being pressured by outside donors. It shouldn’t be beyond the capabilities of modern society to work out a formula and ,if strictly monitored,it should cost far less than the billions thrown at the banks.

  4. Fred Says:

    I see you have annoyed Luke Bozier the bloke is a raving idiot who see’s hard line lefties all over the place.

    He’s written a bit about you on the Labour list site.

    He’s one of those creeps I hate who sucked up to Blair then Brown and now Miliband as he moves forward to getting a safe seat, if they will find one after the boundary changes.

Leave a Reply