The downsides of stalling UK renewables are fracking and horrific human rights abuses

Britain as an island off the mainland of Europe potentially has greater capacity for production of renewable energy than almost the whole of the rest of Europe put together, mainly from onshore and offshore wind, wave and tidal power, and Scottish hydropower.   Yet UK electricity production from renewable energy, though it has increased in the last decade, is still very low and indeed still one of the lowest in the EU.   This is despite the mandatory EU requirement that Britain must generate at least 15% of its primary energy use from renewables by 2020 (whilst most other EU countries are obliged to meet a 20% target) which means that, since renewables make little contribution to transport or space heating, UK use of renewables for electricity production needs to rise to some 35% by 2020.    It is now about 8%, and if Cameron and Paterson have anything to do with it, that small figure may even begin to fall now.   But apart from such shockingly benighted foolishness in throwing away such a potentially world-beating British opportunity for our energy future, there is another darker side to this folly.

As North Sea oil and gas production has now dramatically fallen in recent years, the UK is now heavily dependent on gas imports.   This has bent UK foreign policy towards placating, even courting, some of the world’s nastiest regimes.   The UK has been wooing Azerbaijan, which has an appalling human rights record, because of the huge gas reserves in the giant Shah Deniz field in the Caspian Sea.   Because BP and Sonatrach import gas from Algeria and sell it to the UK power companies, UK foreign policy is consistently supportive of President Bouteflika despite Algeria’s long history of human rights abuses.   Charles Hendry, former energy minister and now Cameron’s Special envoy to the Caspian region, has said that the region is “one of the most exciting places in the world to do business”, which directly counters Cameron’s claim for tougher action against Putin over Ukraine.   Britain is also courting Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan in the same region for their extensive oil and gas fields as well as Qatar in the Middle East, all of which are known to be guilty of long-term human rights abuses.   Claims by the Foreign Office that it always takes up human rights issues, and by the BP and other oil companies that they enhance local living standards, are just weasel words to cover greed for maximum profits.

The other impact of downplaying renewables is Osborne’s massive planned surge for fracking.   This again is a mad rush to folly.   The benefits will be short-lived (even more so than with the much greater repositories in the US), the disruption in our packed small island will be enormous (far greater than in the US), and the pressure on water supplies and the risk of environmental pollution significantly high.   Who wants fracking and courting human rights monsters as the price of UK energy policy when we are sitting on the biggest positive alternative energy bonanza you could ever wish for?   It should be made an election issue.

 

6 thoughts on “The downsides of stalling UK renewables are fracking and horrific human rights abuses

  1. I agree. The policies implemented by Thatcher have led directly to out impotence in dealing with Putin in the Ukraine.
    Putin seems to have read implicitly the tactics Hitler used in destabilising the Sudentenland in Czechoslovakia and also prior to the invasion of Poland and we sit here and now can do nothing at all about this for fear of having our gas supply turned off.
    Hague spouts rhetoric and hot air but knows he cannot do anything. Our ‘Tory’ led media seem incapable of criticising Putin and things can only end in disaster I’m afraid.

  2. there are very many claims against these firms but interestingly they go bust no pay outs and this lot will let that happen over her yes jpcw theres plenty of info out there but one wonders does cams and co read any of it nah pur greed wonder lust in their eyes but I hope you post the pages up on other websites so others van see whot it does jeff3

  3. Go onto You-Tube and put “Fracking In The USA” in the search engine. Watch the damage being done to water supplies and peoples health. Cameron is in favour of fracking but you can bet your life that you will not see a fracking rig in Chipping Campden.
    The most favoured area for fracking is in the North West and Cameron is going to make it easier for companies to get drilling permission. When you wake up one morning and see that tall thing at the bottom of your garden don’t say you weren’t warned.

  4. interestingly the companys that sign these agreements to clean up after themselves go bankrupt thuss leaving the tax payer to try to sort it out but sadly its tolate for mother earth has thy poisoned it once and all jeff3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *