Osborne checkmated by his own austerity

Politics has a curious way of coming back to haunt politicians in a way they never intended or expected.   Osborne is a case in point.   The whole thrust of his austerity strategy, as he repeatedly told us, was to eliminate the structural deficit in this Parliament.   On that basis he predicted in 2010 that the deficit would be down to £40bn this year.   It is actually around £100bn.   Worse, the deficit is no longer shrinking at all, it is rising.   Alasdair Darling’s two expansionary budgets in 2009-10 set in motion economic stimulus which reduced the budget deficit from its peak of £165bn (at 2013-4 prices) to £115bn, a cut of no less than £50bn in two years.   Osborne’s austerity budgets then kicked in  and the deficit actually increased to £121bn in 2012-3, before falling to £98bn last year.   This year it is set to rise again to either just below or just above £100bn.   The whole deficit reduction programme, after all the impoverishment and pain it has inflicted, has gone pear-shaped.   It is worth asking why.

It’s because Osborne has fallen into his own trap.   The government has forced hundreds of thousands of people, either through ‘sanctioning’ (i.e. depriving them of their benefit entitlement often for trivial infringement of the rules) or through draconian work capability assessments, to take jobs which are very low-paid, insecure, part-time, or zero hours contracts.   As a result, the employment growth has been concentrated in the very low-pay sectors of the economy where a large proportion of income fall below the £10,000 personal tax-free allowance.   Consequently income tax payments to the government are falling far short of expectations: the Budget forecast was that they would rise by 5%, but they have actually grown at an annual rate of only 1.8%.   As a result the government’s tax take has been much lower than expected, which drives up the deficit.

So the central question for Osborne as he delivers his Autumn Statement is:  With average incomes suffering the biggest fall since Victorian times, productivity almost the lowest in the OECD, business investment still flat below pre-crash levels, the deficit in traded goods now the biggest in British history, and now to cap it all, the budget deficit actually rising because of the fall in tax receipts, what is the rationale for continuing with austerity when the consequences are themselves now actually causing the deficit to rise?   I shall be demanding an answer to that question from Osborne.

 

 

2 thoughts on “Osborne checkmated by his own austerity

  1. Hopefully this will put an end to the myth that the Tories are good with the economy. All we need now is to convince the country that they’re not and that Labour are! People still persist in writing to my local paper, rubbishing Labour’s record. This might help put the record straight, as it’s about a favourable report by an independent economist:

    http://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/aug/04/labour-economic-record-clean-bill-of-health

    “Labour’s economic record given clean bill of health at home and abroad :- A leading British academic concludes that the last government has been tarnished by spin”

  2. I watched the BBC’s Daily Politics special on the Autumn statement.

    Danny Alexander was questioned by Andrew Neil :
    DA: We’ve halved the deficit.
    AN: Oh no you haven’t! It was £150billion and now it’s £91.3b.
    DA: It’s halved, as it’s now 10.6% of GDP

    Whereas, in answer to the question you raised in Parliament, Osborne stated:
    “The deficit, according to the OBR document, was 10.2% under the previous Labour Government; it is now 5%.”

    Are they just pulling figures out of a hat!? Surely the actual monetary value gives the more accurate picture whereas quoting it as a percentage of GDP is rather meaningless?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *